How do the emotions of
individuals play into, or out of, Inter-Dialogism? To make an Inter-Dialogic
leap into someone’s brain and out again, and glean whatever you can,
presupposes in the individual making the leap that personal emotions will not
interfere with the process. Obviously, human consonance being what it is, this
cannot always be the case. The murkiness of making an Inter-Dialogic leap while
one’s emotions are wreaking havoc with one’s ability to perceive truth is a
fact of life, both in literature (the more personal varieties of literature)
and in our daily lives. In fact, the core essence of both Meta-Dialogism and
Inter-Dialogism are threatened by their potential chiasmus with chaotic,
disheveled, impenetrable emotions, and by the sense that without the
objectivity that manifests along with emotional detachment, both of these leaps
become mere leaps of faith, unsteadied by a relationship to what might be
called intuitive empiricism. This plays out in poetry, literature, and drama,
in the manifestation of unreliable narrators, characters desperate, destructive,
unlucky, and emotionally unsteady enough so that, as intuitive as they might
be, neither we as an audience nor they can ever really be sure they are drawing
the right conclusions from whatever situation might be at hand. Inter-Dialogism
is dogged by subjectivist interests every time, so that rose colored or dark
colored spectacles take raw data and misshape them or configure them out of
proportion. Apparition Poem 1488 is a case in point— a representation of a
harsh situation— complete severance of contact with the beloved in question for
the protagonist— with no reason given. What ever Inter-Dialogic leaps have been
made on both sides have led to stalemate; even as the protagonist, as besotted
as he might be, must adopt the dry ice approach in discussing his predicament:
liquor store, linoleum
floor, wine she chose
was always deep red,
dark, bitter aftertaste,
unlike her bare torso,
which has in it
all that ever was
of drunkenness—
to miss someone terribly,
to both still be in love,
as
she severs things because
she thinks she must—
exquisite torture, it’s
a different bare torso,
(my own) that’s
incarnadine—
We
assume here that there have been Inter-Dialogic leaps on both sides. Yet, if
these are two emotionally vulnerable, emotionally unstable individuals, what
has been communicated from brain to brain cannot sink in and be assimilated the
right way. This is especially the case if booze is involved, which confuses boundaries
and senses of proportions and forces things to flow in a warped direction. That
warpage gives 1488 an eerie glow, and an edge (hinging it back to what I used
to call post-avant poetry) of strange dimensions and unclean leaps,
unclean (less-than-wholesome) consciousness. What emerges is an ambiance of the ensign visionary deadness, employed to define Apparition Poems as a literary text. The significance of the linoleum floor as a symbol is
that it works as a synecdoche of all the different forms of warpage on offer
here— alcoholism, emotional desperation, overactive imaginations, and (perhaps
most tragically) Inter-Dialogic leaps which suggest both some purity of
intention and some genuine psycho-affective chemistry, but which are getting
trampled by the inhumanity of the landscape these characters inhabit. Linoleum
floors are cold, un-homely, homogeneous surfaces, which reflect (also) the
coldness (deadness) of the complete severance between the two in question. The warm,
companionable, sensuous side of drunken-heartedness— vino veritas, also— is
being buried by consciousness which can no longer have stable reactions, so
that what has been learned from the requisite Inter-Dialogic leaps knitting
soul to soul cannot be recalled and skillfully employed the right way. It may
be the case that the muse of 1488 knows this, and that it accounts for her
severance of the relationship. If so, the protagonist has a ways and means of
accessing a note of pure pathos, which resounds in the poem, even as he also
reveals that his assumed mastery of his muse’s heart, and what it has in it
(“all that ever was/of drunkenness”), has to be false, because he seems not to know
the reason for the sudden severance, which should be clear to him. When
Inter-Dialogism is nullified by subjectivist interests, consciousness can
fester and transform itself into all shapes and sizes of narcissistic delusion,
even as the protagonist in 1488 attempts to reach beyond his
narcissism, bring circumstances back to life.
Post a Comment